Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009714›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Audit of preparedness of a selected hospital in the face of radiation and nuclear threats: participatory action research.

Fatemeh Esmaili, Ali Moradi, Abdollah Saghafi, Esmail Heidaranlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatemeh EsmailiRadiation Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali MoradiNursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abdollah SaghafiNursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Esmail HeidaranluNursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. eheidaranlu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the risk of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive (CBRNe) terrorist attacks has been on the rise. Radiological emergencies can occur not only due to accidents but also as a consequence of nuclear terrorism. In the event of disasters and emergency situations, healthcare systems, particularly hospitals as the primary units of service delivery in the initial phase, play the most significant roles. Therefore, the present study was designed with the aim of auditing the preparedness of a selected hospital in the face of radiological and nuclear incidents. This participatory action research was carried out over one year (2025) in relevant departments of a selected hospital. The study was conducted in a specialized hospital in central Tehran, with an approximate capacity of 150 active beds. The hospital has an established emergency management structure and active risk committees. Data were collected using a researcher-made checklist covering six dimensions: physical infrastructure, pharmaceuticals and equipment, nuclear-radiological standards and indicators, human resources, communication, and inter-organizational coordination. During the audit cycle, a program was implemented to improve work processes and enhance hospital preparedness against radiological-nuclear threats. The hospital’s preparedness score before and after the intervention was compared and analyzed using SPSS version 22. According to the six evaluated dimensions, non-compliance indicators in each area were identified by process owners under the supervision of the hospital risk committee. Operational changes were carried out on three key criteria: low cost, short time consumption, and high feasibility. The hospital’s preparedness score in facing nuclear-radiological threats increased from 84 to 146, and the preparedness percentage improved from 24% to 41.71% (i.e., from weak to moderate). Among the six dimensions evaluated, the greatest improvement was observed in pharmaceuticals/equipment and inter-organizational coordination (20% each), while the lowest improvement occurred in the human resources domain (4%). Implementing solutions derived from audit findings, along with adequate resource allocation and management requirements, can enhance hospital resilience and preparedness levels against complex radiological and nuclear threats. Ultimately, this study emphasizes preparedness as a dynamic process that requires periodic review, continuous training, and inter-sectoral collaboration to ensure effective response and life-saving actions during nuclear-radiological crises.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningHospitalsRadioactive Hazard ReleaseHealth Services ResearchHumansIranTerrorismAuditHospital preparednessNuclear-radiological threats

Identifiers

PMID42009714
PMCPMC13260457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.