Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009707›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Data-driven analysis of dynamic amplification for ballast-less railway track: using a triple-beam model and XGBoost.

Mehdi Koohmishi, Mahdi Adibi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehdi KoohmishiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.
Mahdi AdibiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran. m.adibi@ub.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a data-driven approach for modelling ballast-less railway tracks using a triple-beam model and delineating effective parameters influencing dynamic amplification factor (DAF). An analytical–numerical approach is employed to solve the triple-beam model subjected to a concentrated moving load with constant velocity. This approach represents rails, concrete slab and concrete base as beams, while also characterizing visco-elastic connections between beams and incorporating a visco-elastic model for foundation. Experimental tests are used to validate the established triple-beam model. The DAF values determined based on the extreme deflections are integrated with machine learning model, i.e. XGBoost, to identify influential parameters. In general, parametric variations of the visco-elastic connection layers, including rail fasteners, cement-emulsified asphalt mortar (CEAM) layer, and subgrade, indicate that an increase in spring stiffness results in a higher DAF. Moreover, considering the bending stiffness of the three specified beams, adopting different structural thicknesses for the concrete beams leads to negligible variations in the DAF when damping is taken into account. The results of the machine learning models indicate that the damping characteristics of the CEAM layer and subgrade are the most significant parameters influencing the DAF. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the stiffness values of these layers provide an additional contribution to regulating the DAF.

Indexed as

Ballast-less trackDynamic amplification factorMachine learningTriple-beam modelXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42009707
PMCPMC13261016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.