ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026
Remote sensing reveals that wild herbivores limit senescent vegetation accumulation on dryland conservation reserves.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Remote sensing reveals that wild herbivores limit senescent vegetation accumulation on dryland conservation reserves.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wild herbivores threaten vegetation recovery on dryland conservation reserves globally. Monitoring herbivore impacts in remote drylands is difficult because vegetation biomass transitions between living and senescent states in response to irregular precipitation events. However, land managers need detailed understanding of the impacts that wild herbivores have on vegetation to develop and refine herbivore management strategies. Remote sensing provides the ability to assess grazing impacts on living and senescent vegetation with high temporal and spatial resolution. Here, we use Sentinel-2 satellite imagery to investigate how grazing by kangaroos and rabbits impacted fractional cover of photosynthetic (PV) and non-photosynthetic (NPV) vegetation over a 7-year period on three dryland reserves with experimental herbivore exclusion plots. We compared PV and NPV cover in plots that were accessible to all herbivores, accessible to kangaroos only, and inaccessible to both rabbits and kangaroos. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine if the grazing impacts of rabbits and kangaroos varied from each other, between reserves, and in response to variable rainfall patterns. Grazing impacts varied between each herbivore, conservation reserve, and between PV and NPV. PV was only weakly limited by kangaroos across all reserves and antecedent rainfall totals. NPV was limited by rabbits and kangaroos, with grazing having stronger impacts on NPV than PV. The grazing impacts of rabbits and kangaroos varied spatially with evidence that NPV was limited by kangaroos only, by rabbits only, and by both species across different reserves. Both herbivores had stronger impacts on NPV as antecedent rainfall decreased. Our results show that the impact of herbivores on vegetation biomass is greatest during periods of dry climatic conditions. These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence showing that grazing by wild herbivores can have detrimental impacts on dryland ecosystems by disrupting ecological processes supported by NPV. Our results highlight the importance of herbivore management during productive periods to ensure NPV is retained during periods of low rainfall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.