Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009580›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

BAR12: Bayesian Autoregressive Phase 1-2 Design for Cell Therapy Trials With Manufacturing Changes.

Cheng-Han Yang, Peter F Thall, David Marin, Sheferaw Y Belay, Ruitao Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheng-Han YangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4161-3140
Peter F ThallDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-529X
David MarinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sheferaw Y BelayDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ruitao LinDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2244-131X

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Project 3: InHANCE: Fibrosis Imaging Biomarkers of Radiation: An Orphan Drug Study to Evaluate REduction of SeVERity of Symptoms in a Randomized Evaluative Trial (FIBRO2SE-REVERSE)P01CA278716 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kristy Brock, Clifton David Fuller · 2025 to 2026
$7.2M
Bayesian Methods for Complex Precision Biotherapy Trials in OncologyR01CA261978 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIN, RUITAO, THALL, PETER F · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Novel designs for multi-arm multi-dose multi-stage platform trialsR21LM014699 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Ruitao Lin · 2025 to 2026
$405k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA278716NIH HHS P01CA278716NIH HHS P30CA016672NIH HHS R01CA261978NIH HHS R21LM014699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An early phase dose-finding trial of a new cell therapy may involve one or more manufacturing modifications made during the trial, known as "tweaks," to improve the cell product quality. For example, a tweak may change the cell culture duration, cytokine cocktail, or donor criteria. Ideally, a tweak can be done without changing the treatment so much that the trial must be restarted as if the treatment were entirely new. However, a statistical design still should account for changes in the dose-response distribution due to the tweak. For such settings, we propose a Bayesian AutoRegressive Phase 1-2 (BAR12) design that accounts for manufacturing tweaks during a phase 1-2 trial by using a first order autoregressive model with spike-and-slab priors having components corresponding to pre- and post-tweak distributions of toxicity and efficacy parameters. Simulations under a broad range of dose-response functions were conducted to compare BAR12 to conventional phase 1-2 designs that either assume the tweak had no effect and use all available data, or ignore the pre-tweak data. The simulations show that BAR12 has superior operating characteristics, including higher probabilities of correct dose selection, allocation of more patients to optimal doses, and more efficient monitoring for identifying unsafe or ineffective doses.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansModels, StatisticalRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID42009580
PMCPMC13095505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.