ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
BAR12: Bayesian Autoregressive Phase 1-2 Design for Cell Therapy Trials With Manufacturing Changes.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An early phase dose-finding trial of a new cell therapy may involve one or more manufacturing modifications made during the trial, known as "tweaks," to improve the cell product quality. For example, a tweak may change the cell culture duration, cytokine cocktail, or donor criteria. Ideally, a tweak can be done without changing the treatment so much that the trial must be restarted as if the treatment were entirely new. However, a statistical design still should account for changes in the dose-response distribution due to the tweak. For such settings, we propose a Bayesian AutoRegressive Phase 1-2 (BAR12) design that accounts for manufacturing tweaks during a phase 1-2 trial by using a first order autoregressive model with spike-and-slab priors having components corresponding to pre- and post-tweak distributions of toxicity and efficacy parameters. Simulations under a broad range of dose-response functions were conducted to compare BAR12 to conventional phase 1-2 designs that either assume the tweak had no effect and use all available data, or ignore the pre-tweak data. The simulations show that BAR12 has superior operating characteristics, including higher probabilities of correct dose selection, allocation of more patients to optimal doses, and more efficient monitoring for identifying unsafe or ineffective doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.