ArticleBMJ open2026
Dynamic trade-off evaluation framework for bariatric surgery outcomes: a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGuided by Straussian Grounded Theory, this study aimed to explore patients' dynamic trade-off processes in evaluating bariatric surgery outcomes and to construct a patient-centred theoretical framework to inform clinical assessment and intervention.
designQualitative study using Straussian Grounded Theory, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using open, axial and selective coding. Reporting followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.
settingThis study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in China between June 2023 and August 2023.
participantsA total of 11 patients who had undergone bariatric surgery were enrolled, aged 21-54 years, with postoperative follow-up durations ranging from 1 to 10 years.
resultsA core category-
conclusionThis study proposes a novel theoretical framework elucidating how patients dynamically evaluate bariatric surgery outcomes. By revealing stage-specific mechanisms and moderating factors, the framework provides a theoretical basis for improving preoperative expectation management and postoperative support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.