Observational studyThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2026
Measuring population immunity against influenza using individual antibody titres: a multicountry, retrospective observational study.
Observational study in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occupationally Exposed and General Population Antibody Profiles to Influenza A Viruses Circulating in Swine as Indication of Zoonotic Risk.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring population immunity is crucial for epidemic preparedness, but methods to translate individual immunity into population-level immunity metrics remain underdeveloped. We aimed to develop and evaluate population immunity estimators using influenza as a model pathogen.
methodsIn this multicountry, retrospective observational study, we analysed 41 835 serum samples from six studies in China, Hong Kong, Viet Nam, and the USA across 27 influenza epidemics in 2009-24. We constructed four population-immunity estimators from individual antibody titres: geometric mean titre, proportion of non-naive individuals, proportion of population immune, and relative reduction in reproductive number calculated using a next-generation matrix framework. We evaluated the ability of these estimators to predict which subtype (H1N1 vs H3N2) would dominate, to predict whether epidemics would be larger or smaller than the previous season, and to correlate with subsequent cumulative incidence in a longitudinal Hong Kong cohort spanning eight influenza seasons with within-epidemic serum collection.
findingsSubtype-specific relative changes in these estimators from previous seasons correctly predicted 57-86% of H1N1-dominant seasons and 100% of H3N2-dominant seasons, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 79-93%. The estimators correctly predicted larger epidemics in 67-83% of cases and smaller epidemics in 90-100% of cases, with an AUROC of 83-92%. Performance varied by estimator and influenza subtype, with wide uncertainty intervals for some estimates indicating modest precision. In the longitudinal Hong Kong cohort, all four estimators negatively correlated with subsequent 30-day cumulative incidence for H1N1 (Pearson correlations -0·23 to -0·46), whereas H3N2 correlations were mostly non-significant.
interpretationWe developed and validated four complementary population immunity estimators derived from individual antibody titres that showed predictive utility for influenza subtype dominance and epidemic size direction across diverse settings. These estimators could inform seasonal influenza preparedness, surveillance prioritisation, and health-care resource planning.
fundingHong Kong Health Bureau and Research Grants Council.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.