ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Dynamic characteristics comparison between non-spherical hydrodynamic cavitation bubbles and spark-induced cavitation bubbles.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we develop a new experimental approach using the whipping motion of a large-deformation flexible body in water, which achieves stable generation of single non-spherical hydrodynamic cavitation bubbles in a quiescent environment. We also systematically compare the dynamic characteristics between whipping-induced and spark-induced cavitation bubbles. Whipping-induced bubbles exhibit obvious daughter bubble shedding during evolution, with rough surfaces covered by protruding sub-bubbles and implosive rebound during collapse. In contrast, spark-induced bubbles evolve nearly spherically with smooth surfaces and negligible daughter bubble shedding. Whipping-induced bubbles show significant temporal asymmetry between growth and collapse: their growth duration is much longer than the collapse time, unlike spark-induced bubbles, which display nearly symmetric evolution. Regarding shock wave characteristics, whipping-induced bubbles produce multi-sequential shock waves upon collapse, with pressure signals consisting of a main peak plus multiple low-amplitude waves. Spark-induced bubbles, however, emit isolated spherical shock waves with concentrated energy and high peak pressure. Whipping-induced bubbles have a much lower content of non-condensable gas, resulting in fewer oscillations, shorter lifetime, and less residual gas after collapse. The effects of liquid conductivity, viscosity, and temperature on the evolution of both bubble types are also investigated. This study provides a new approach for the experimental investigation of non-spherical hydrodynamic single bubbles and lays a theoretical foundation for clarifying their applicable ranges in single-bubble research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.