Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008738›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2026

Capturing Latino Health Disparities: Lessons from Mail- and Community-Based Population Health Surveys in California.

April P Vang, Juanita Elizabeth Quino, Angelica M Rolon, Alexa Morales Arana, Julie H T Dang, Moon S Chen, Primo N Lara, Laura Fejerman, Luis G Carvajal-Carmona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

April P Vang *The Health Equity Science and Community Research Laboratory (THE LCC Lab), Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0009-0001-0027-5114
Juanita Elizabeth Quino *The Health Equity Science and Community Research Laboratory (THE LCC Lab), Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0967-5827
Angelica M Rolon *The Health Equity Science and Community Research Laboratory (THE LCC Lab), Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0009-0007-3392-0937
Alexa Morales AranaThe Health Equity Science and Community Research Laboratory (THE LCC Lab), Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8409-6959
Julie H T DangUniversity of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-7457
Moon S ChenUniversity of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0076-2550
Primo N LaraUniversity of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-0002
Laura FejermanUniversity of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3179-1151
Luis G Carvajal-CarmonaThe Health Equity Science and Community Research Laboratory (THE LCC Lab), Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-2918

Funding

University of California and UT Southwestern D-PDTCU54CA283766 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Jonathan W Riess · 2023 to 2026
$5.9M
University of California, Davis: Human Papillomavirus Cancer Free (UCD: HPV Cancer Free)K01CA258956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Julie Dang · 2023 to 2026
$672k
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 1K01CA258956-01A1National Cancer Institute (NCI) D43CA260689National Cancer Institute (NCI) P30CA093373National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA223978National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA223978-05S2National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA223978-2S2National Cancer Institute (NCI) R56CA280636National Cancer Institute (NCI) U54CA233306National Cancer Institute (NCI) U54CA233306-1SNational Cancer Institute (NCI) U54CA233306-1S3National Cancer Institute (NCI) U54CA280811National Cancer Institute (NCI) U54CA283766NCI NIH HHS K01 CA258956NCI NIH HHS U54 CA283766Placer Breast Cancer Endowed ChairThe Heart, BrEast, and BrAin HeaLth Equity ResearchUC Davis Office of the Provost
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Latinos face significant cancer health disparities and remain underrepresented in research. To address regional needs, the University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center (UCDCCC) conducted its first Catchment Area Population Assessment (CAPA) to inform outreach and engagement strategies. Our purpose was to understand the best approaches for capturing Latino health need responses and to understand breast and cervical cancer screening rates and risk factors. This cross-sectional study compared two CAPA survey methodologies used from July 2019 to March 2020: a mail-based approach using random and unweighted probabilistic sampling of residential addresses versus a community-based approach using bilingual coordinators for in-person interviews. Comparisons were made on catchment population representativeness and breast and cervical cancer screening outcomes. The study included 361 Latino participants (255 community based and 106 mail based) across 16 of 19 UCDCCC catchment counties. Mail-based participants were significantly older, more educated, and had higher household incomes than community-based participants. Despite the differences in key demographics of participants in the two survey modalities, our results suggest that up-to-date breast and cervical cancer screening rates do not significantly differ. Time since the last routine checkup, primarily among community-based participants, emerged as a key predictor of screening adherence. Mail-based methods captured more affluent Latinos, whereas community-based methods reached more underserved populations. Each method introduced distinct sampling biases, but together they provided a more balanced representation of the catchment area. Mail- and community-based survey methods enhance the representativeness of Latino health data and support more equitable research recruitment strategies. SIGNIFICANCE: Latinos remain underrepresented in cancer research, limiting effective outreach. This study demonstrates that combining mail- and community-based survey methods improves representation across socioeconomic groups, revealing key predictors of breast and cervical cancer screening adherence. These findings inform equitable data collection and engagement strategies, advancing inclusive cancer prevention efforts in underserved populations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHealth SurveysHispanic or LatinoUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCaliforniaCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostal ServiceSocioeconomic Disparities in Health

Identifiers

PMID42008738
PMCPMC13095202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.