ArticleCancer research communications2026
Capturing Latino Health Disparities: Lessons from Mail- and Community-Based Population Health Surveys in California.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Latinos face significant cancer health disparities and remain underrepresented in research. To address regional needs, the University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center (UCDCCC) conducted its first Catchment Area Population Assessment (CAPA) to inform outreach and engagement strategies. Our purpose was to understand the best approaches for capturing Latino health need responses and to understand breast and cervical cancer screening rates and risk factors. This cross-sectional study compared two CAPA survey methodologies used from July 2019 to March 2020: a mail-based approach using random and unweighted probabilistic sampling of residential addresses versus a community-based approach using bilingual coordinators for in-person interviews. Comparisons were made on catchment population representativeness and breast and cervical cancer screening outcomes. The study included 361 Latino participants (255 community based and 106 mail based) across 16 of 19 UCDCCC catchment counties. Mail-based participants were significantly older, more educated, and had higher household incomes than community-based participants. Despite the differences in key demographics of participants in the two survey modalities, our results suggest that up-to-date breast and cervical cancer screening rates do not significantly differ. Time since the last routine checkup, primarily among community-based participants, emerged as a key predictor of screening adherence. Mail-based methods captured more affluent Latinos, whereas community-based methods reached more underserved populations. Each method introduced distinct sampling biases, but together they provided a more balanced representation of the catchment area. Mail- and community-based survey methods enhance the representativeness of Latino health data and support more equitable research recruitment strategies. SIGNIFICANCE: Latinos remain underrepresented in cancer research, limiting effective outreach. This study demonstrates that combining mail- and community-based survey methods improves representation across socioeconomic groups, revealing key predictors of breast and cervical cancer screening adherence. These findings inform equitable data collection and engagement strategies, advancing inclusive cancer prevention efforts in underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.