ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Predictability of complex networks.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We establish network predictability theory by mapping link prediction onto a spin glass model, where network partitions correspond to spin configurations, and predictability equals the system's average energy. Using the cavity method from statistical physics, we prove that global predictability decomposes into individual link contributions, enabling an efficient local sampling algorithm that reduces the computational complexity of evaluating individual link contributions from being dependent on the entire network to only its local neighborhood, scaling with the average degree. We derive exact results for canonical network models: Erdös-Rényi networks exhibit universal predictability of 0.5 regardless of algorithm choice, establishing the random baseline, while structured networks show predictability controlled by their prior parameters. We introduce the predictability index, which quantifies the maximum achievable performance without information loss and accurately predicts algorithm performance under random division. Analysis of real networks validates our framework, revealing how degree heterogeneity and structural patterns govern predictability. This physics-based approach provides both theoretical insights into link prediction limits and practical tools for assessing network reconstruction potential, with implications for applications from biological network inference to social network analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.