Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008682›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Predictability of complex networks.

Fei Jing, Zi-Ke Zhang, Qingpeng Zhang, Giorgio Parisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fei JingMusketeers Foundation Institute of Data Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Zi-Ke ZhangCenter for Digital Communication Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Qingpeng ZhangMusketeers Foundation Institute of Data Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6819-0686
Giorgio ParisiInternational Research Center of Complexity Sciences, Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou 311115, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-5222

Funding

MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 71972164MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 72371224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We establish network predictability theory by mapping link prediction onto a spin glass model, where network partitions correspond to spin configurations, and predictability equals the system's average energy. Using the cavity method from statistical physics, we prove that global predictability decomposes into individual link contributions, enabling an efficient local sampling algorithm that reduces the computational complexity of evaluating individual link contributions from being dependent on the entire network to only its local neighborhood, scaling with the average degree. We derive exact results for canonical network models: Erdös-Rényi networks exhibit universal predictability of 0.5 regardless of algorithm choice, establishing the random baseline, while structured networks show predictability controlled by their prior parameters. We introduce the predictability index, which quantifies the maximum achievable performance without information loss and accurately predicts algorithm performance under random division. Analysis of real networks validates our framework, revealing how degree heterogeneity and structural patterns govern predictability. This physics-based approach provides both theoretical insights into link prediction limits and practical tools for assessing network reconstruction potential, with implications for applications from biological network inference to social network analysis.

Indexed as

algorithmic performancecavity methodspin glasses

Identifiers

PMID42008682
PMCPMC13123866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.