Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008583›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Implementation of a Cancer Navigation Intervention for Newly Diagnosed Survivors of Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Melba Sheila D'Souza, Ruby Gidda, Michelle Smith, Arati Swaminadhan, Amy Jean Strank, Ashwin Nairy

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melba Sheila D'SouzaNursing and Population Health, School of Nursing, Thompson Rivers University, 805 TRU Way Kamloops, Kamloops, BC, V2C 0C8, Canada, 1 6047516672, 1 6047516672.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-0663
Ruby GiddaSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Abbotsford, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-0100-0259
Michelle SmithFaculty of Health and Social Development, UBC School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2686-3915
Arati SwaminadhanThe University of British Columbia, UBC Experimental Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-8484-9269
Amy Jean StrankHome Health, Interior Health, Kamloops, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-8842-5547
Ashwin NairyThe University of British Columbia, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-3098-2033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cancer inequities among vulnerable populations in rural areas remain a public health challenge in Canada. Rural populations are defined as vulnerable due to geographic isolation, limited access to specialized oncology care, and socioeconomic barriers such as transportation and financial toxicity. Professional navigation offers a potential solution to bridge these gaps, yet there is a lack of evidence on the barriers to and facilitators of its adoption in breast cancer survivorship. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a cancer navigation intervention using professional navigators compared to the standard of care (medical care) in improving the quality of life and functional outcomes of newly diagnosed survivors of breast cancer in interior British Columbia. Methods: A single-center, parallel-group, open-cohort randomized controlled trial is being conducted over 3 years. Ethics approval was obtained for the study. Participants who provide informed consent are randomized into 2 groups: the intervention group receives the cancer navigation intervention and the control group receives the standard of care (the usual medical care offered by health care practitioners). The baseline study time point spanned January to March 2025, the first follow-up spanned April to June 2025 at 3 months after enrollment, and the second follow-up spanned July to September 2025 at the end of 6 months after enrollment. The cancer navigation intervention comprises direct psychosocial and educational webinars, coordinated telephone support services, and community-based cancer care resources. Professional navigators are qualified registered nurses who facilitate information and connect participants with available supportive resources, services, and programs. The main outcomes are financial distress, quality of life, and satisfaction with navigation and interpersonal relationships. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast, Breast Cancer Navigation Survey, Participant Satisfaction With Navigation Scale, Satisfaction With Interpersonal Relationships Survey, and Breast Cancer Navigation Interview are used in the study. Steps are being taken to ensure the trustworthiness of the qualitative data. With a 5% level of significance (2 tailed) and 90% power, the sample size was calculated as 108. Results: Data collection took place from January 2 to September 30, 2025. A total of 164 participants were recruited. Conclusions: This study aims to demonstrate effectiveness and satisfaction with professional navigation and knowledge translation for future implementation of a cancer navigation intervention in British Columbia.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsPatient NavigationAdultBritish ColumbiaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccancercancer navigationdigital healthearly survivorshipmixed methodsoncologypatient engagementrandomized controlled trialrural communitiessupportive care

Identifiers

PMID42008583
PMCPMC13094795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.