Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008540›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

From Anatomy to Innovation: Embedding Patient-Centered Design in Medical Education.

Louis John Koizia, Pieter Vandekerckhove, Steven Howard, Bettina Maisch, Benjamin Howell Lole Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reframing Cancer Education Through Mental Health Literacy: Integrating the Psychosocial Dimension of Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Learning with Patients: Reflections on Cancer, Complexity and Innovation in Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louis John KoiziaCutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, White City Campus, London, W12 7TA, United Kingdom, 44 7765020719.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-6926
Pieter VandekerckhoveDelft Centre for Entrepreneurship, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-6563
Steven HowardDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0056-6680
Bettina MaischDepartment of Applied Sciences and Mechatronics, Munich University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9474-0226
Benjamin Howell Lole HarrisCutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, White City Campus, London, W12 7TA, United Kingdom, 44 7765020719.ORCID 0000-0002-8154-8953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Medical education has traditionally focused on mastering biomedical knowledge, clinical skills, and professionalism. Yet it remains poorly equipped to prepare doctors for the complex, rapidly changing health systems they will work in. Despite repeated calls for transformative learning, progress in teaching system innovation has been limited. Current curricula produce clinicians adept at treating disease but often underprepared to address system failures or contribute to organizational change. Embedding patient-centered innovation within training may help address this gap. This approach integrates design thinking, value-based health care, and co-design with patients to cultivate the metacompetence required to engage with system change. Emerging examples suggest that innovation education is most effective when integrated within existing activities such as quality improvement initiatives, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protected time for improvement work. Teaching these principles early may help normalize innovation as an integral component of clinical practice rather than a peripheral activity. Lessons from the successful integration of communication skills and ethics into medical curricula demonstrate that such cultural shifts are possible. Practical approaches may include incorporating design-thinking exercises, patient co-creation activities, and innovation projects alongside existing quality improvement and leadership programs. Reframing innovation as part of professional responsibility may empower clinicians to act as catalysts for system improvement. From anatomy to innovation, medical education must continue to evolve, preparing doctors not only to treat patients but also to engage with the systems that shape health care delivery.

Indexed as

AnatomyEducation, MedicalPatient-Centered CareCurriculumHumansOrganizational Innovationcurriculumeducational innovationreformtransformative learningvalue-based health care

Identifiers

PMID42008540
PMCPMC13094798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.