ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Assessing retention of pandemic capacities from COVID-19 in humanitarian settings: A cross-sectional retrospective study of health workers in Honduras, Syria, and South Sudan.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global health security landscape remains critically vulnerable to emerging pandemic threats. Humanitarian settings face particularly acute challenges in health workforce preparedness and response capabilities. Humanitarian settings have traditionally been left out of global health security and other health system strengthening investments. There is also a significant gap in the literature around building sustained health worker pandemic capacities in these challenging contexts. This novel study measured the retention or 'shelf-life' of perceived COVID-19 training benefits for health workers around knowledge, skills, and confidence to face future infectious disease threats. The Dynamic Sustainability Framework was used for conceptual framing. The study spanned three distinct humanitarian settings: Honduras, Syria, and South Sudan. Employing a cross-sectional, retrospective self-assessment design, 129 primary healthcare and community level health workers were surveyed in March-April 2024. Participants self-reported pandemic capacities on five-point Likert ratings across three time points - retrospective recall for pre- and post-training, and for present status, which was on average three years after training. Results demonstrated substantial increases post-training in self-reported knowledge (p < 0.001), skills (p < 0.001), and confidence (p < 0.001), and sustained or improved capacities at present (knowledge (p < 0.01), skills (p < 0.01), and confidence (p < 0.001)). Despite low access to ongoing training, resources, and support, 84.3% of health workers reported feeling prepared to face emergent disease risks (COVID-19 or other). The results call for further exploration of the individual, training-related, facility, and contextual factors affecting the capacity retention. Due to study design limitations, these results cannot be attributed to the trainings or generalized to all health workers in these countries. Still, this research contributes critical insights into the potential sustained benefits of frontline health workforce pandemic capacity building in humanitarian settings. Since capacities were retained despite limited ongoing training and support, targeted, sustained investments become crucial to preserve and enhance health security in the most fragile health systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.