ArticlePloS one2026
Enhancing flood prediction through physics-driven typhoon feature engineering and machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Typhoon-induced extreme floods pose severe threats to subtropical watersheds, yet systematic integration of typhoon physics into machine learning flood prediction remains limited. This study developed a physics-informed machine learning framework for the Boluo watershed, South China, emphasizing typhoon feature engineering. Four models (Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB)) were systematically evaluated across three feature engineering scenarios: Baseline (conventional hydrometeorological variables), With Typhoon (original typhoon observations), and Enhanced Typhoon (19 physics-informed derived features). Physics-driven design included sigmoid-transformed distance decay functions representing saturating near-field typhoon influence, multi-day cumulative impact indices integrating antecedent storm effects, and trajectory-based kinematic features characterizing translation speed and directional evolution. ANN-EnTY achieved superior performance with Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) of 0.946 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 174 m³/s, representing a 3.1% improvement in KGE and 16.7 m³/s reduction in RMSE compared to the Baseline scenario. During a representative extreme flood event with peak flow of 7670 m³/s, ANN-EnTY reduced peak prediction error by approximately 4% relative to the best-performing baseline model. SHAP analysis revealed upstream flow dominance (72.6%), while typhoon features, contributing only 2% overall, played critical synergistic roles during extremes. This dual-mode pattern of routine memory-driven versus extreme event-driven responses provides mechanistic insights for operational flood warning systems. The framework offers replicable methodology for typhoon-prone watersheds with direct implications for disaster preparedness and water management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.