Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008501›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

An exploratory analysis of changes in work values among nurses before and after pregnancy.

Yukari Hara, Aoi Nakagawa, Junko Omori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yukari HaraGraduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-335X
Aoi NakagawaYamagata Prefecture Shonai General Branch Office Health Planning Division, Higashitagawa, Yamagata, Japan.
Junko OmoriSt. Luke's International University Graduate School of Nursing, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate changes in work values among Japanese nurses before and after pregnancy, their return to work while managing childcare responsibilities, and the multifaceted factors influencing these changes. A web-based survey of 199 female nurses assessed their work values before and after pregnancy, including retrospective questions and open-ended responses. Data were analyzed comprehensively using paired t-tests, generalized estimating equations, and inductive thematic analysis. Only prestige work values demonstrated a significant decrease after pregnancy, as revealed by paired t-tests. Generalized estimating equation analysis identified age at first child, social support from family and other sources, employment status, and educational background as the main factors influencing changes in work values. Qualitative findings indicated that this decline in prestige work values was due to a shift in nurses' awareness that "their life became centered on their children and family," alongside family roles and time constraints that limited career development. This study demonstrates that Japanese nurses experience significant changes in their work values during the transition from childbirth to work re-entry. These changes are intricately shaped by several factors, particularly individual life stage variables and social support from family and other sources. A nuanced understanding of these shifts in work values is essential for developing effective and individualized support systems to promote the retention and long-term career development of female nurses in Japan.

Indexed as

EmploymentNursesAdultFemaleHumansJapanPregnancySocial SupportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42008501
PMCPMC13094997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.