ArticlePloS one2026
Vector-borne disease surveillance and control resource needs in Colorado public health organizations.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2002, Colorado has experienced a high vector-borne disease (VBD) burden from diseases like West Nile fever, plague, and tularemia. Recent evidence underscores a lack of vector-borne surveillance and control program capacity across public health organizations, prompting our evaluation of funding and resource needs for such programs in Colorado. We assessed the needs, organizational capacity, and mitigation strategies of Colorado public health organizations' VBD programs using a convergent mixed methods study design. Between January and May 2024, we surveyed and interviewed key public health organizations leaders. Findings were determined through mixed methods integration of survey data, thematic analysis on interviews, and content analysis on financial and policy documents. Overall, 28 public health practitioners (35% response rate) at 24 Colorado public health organizations (63% urban, 25% rural, 13% frontier counties) were surveyed and 18 were interviewed. We found only 37.5% of Colorado's public health organizations conducted vector surveillance for any vector species. Smaller rural and frontier communities (<100K people) were particularly vulnerable to inadequate VBD organizational capacity and resource availability, and public health organizations in areas with populations < 10K or between 51-100K did not conduct vector surveillance. Interviewees perceived their VBD surveillance and program capacity as inadequate and reported significant limitations in their ability to carry out vector control activities. Moreover, they reported that competing priorities for emerging diseases resulted in reactionary rather than proactive responses to VBDs, highlighting the lack of sustainable funding for vector programs. As VBDs continue to increase in Colorado, outbreaks of diseases like West Nile fever or plague will likely go undetected without improved surveillance. The findings from our study have implications for where surveillance and control are lacking and highlight opportunities to continue improving and supporting surveillance and controls programs for VBDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.