ArticlePloS one2026
A cross-dataset harmonized intrusion detection framework with statistically validated multi-model learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are considered critical security tools in ensuring network infrastructure security. However, recent studies on machine learning-based IDS systems are often constrained by their heavy dependence on a single dataset, lack of reproducibility, and lack of transparency in evaluating their performance. In addressing these challenges, a unified and transparent framework for evaluating IDS systems is proposed, which focuses on integrating feature harmonization, multi-model benchmarking, and statistical validation. In achieving this objective, a preprocessing pipeline is designed to harmonize features of both legacy and contemporary network intrusion datasets, i.e., NSL-KDD and CICIDS2017, respectively. This framework will assess various learning models, including supervised, unsupervised, deep learning, and ensemble-based models, through cross-validation and statistical tests such as Wilcoxon signed-rank, McNemar's, and DeLong tests. Experimental results demonstrate that the Random Forest model performs best in terms of performance metrics, i.e., 98.0% accuracy and 97.0% F1-score on the harmonized data set. Moreover, feature harmonization is found to be the most important factor in improving performance using ablation analysis. Besides, a novel approach of using a cryptographic logging mechanism using SHA-256 hash chaining is proposed for tamper-evident traceability and reproducibility of results in experiments, though it is not as effective as using a blockchain-based approach. Although effective in its application, it is based on manual feature alignment and hence might not be effective in highly heterogeneous data sets.This work provides a unified, reproducible, and statistically grounded framework for evaluating IDS systems, focusing on generalization and transparency in cybersecurity research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.