Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008454›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2026

Forest tree diversity is dependent on both mycorrhizal type and scale.

Kathryn N Maley, Mary Catherine Aime

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathryn N MaleyDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0085-4642
Mary Catherine AimeDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of forest communities is intricately shaped by the mycorrhizal associations that trees form with soil fungi. Mycorrhizae, which are mutualistic relationships between fungi and plants, play pivotal roles in nutrient exchange and tree survival. This review explores how the type of mycorrhizal association-arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (ECM)-impacts forest tree diversity across various scales. AM fungi dominate tropical forests, potentially contributing to high species richness, while ECM fungi are more prevalent in temperate regions, where they often correlate with lower diversity. We discuss how these associations influence soil properties, plant-soil feedback, and seedling establishment, ultimately shaping forest structure. We also examine the complexity of the relationship between mycorrhizal type and tree species richness, noting the differences in patterns observed across different spatial scales. As research continues, it will be crucial to examine local dynamics in underrepresented regions and explore how mycorrhizal interactions change over time to understand their role in maintaining forest biodiversity. By considering these dynamics, we can better predict how forests will respond to environmental changes and develop strategies for preserving and restoring forest ecosystems.

Indexed as

BiodiversityForestsMycorrhizaeTreesSoil MicrobiologySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID42008454
PMCPMC13094957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.