ArticlePloS one2026
Gaps in knowledge and use of artemether-lumefantrine among university students in Southwestern Nigeria: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inappropriate use of antimalarial medications can accelerate the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), undermining treatment efficacy and public health goals. Artemether-lumefantrine (A/L) is the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in Nigeria, yet its misuse persists, particularly among young adults. This study assessed knowledge gaps in A/L use among university students in Southwestern Nigeria to identify opportunities for targeted intervention. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among undergraduate students from three universities in Southwestern Nigeria. Respondents' knowledge of A/L was categorized as good (≥70%), fair (50-69%), or poor (<50%). Associations between knowledge and demographic or experiential variables were analysed using independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA, with significance set at p < 0.05. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 27. A total of 392 students participated, with a mean age of 19.5 years; 58.4% were female. While 64.5% knew the correct timing for the second dose of A/L, only 22.2% correctly identified appropriate storage methods. About 94.9% preferred swallowing the drug with water after food, but many were unaware of common side effects or appropriate responses. Overall, 44.6% of students demonstrated poor knowledge of A/L use. Knowledge scores differed significantly by level of study (p = 0.001) and previous use of antimalarials (p = 0.04). Substantial knowledge gaps and misconceptions about A/L use exist among university students in Southwestern Nigeria. These findings underscore the urgent need for health education initiatives targeting young adults to promote safe and effective use of antimalarial medications and may inform health education strategies aimed at promoting rational antimalarial use and strengthening malaria control efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.