ArticlePloS one2026
Which turtle should I study? Uneven distribution of research effort across Testudines species.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding why some species are more often studied than others can provide valuable information on potential biases that research effort discrepancies can cause and help to direct future research to mitigate these biases. Turtles form an order of reptiles in which the majority of species (67%) are threatened with extinction, but they show high variation in the amount of research devoted to each species. We aimed to quantify this variation across all recognized extant species, and to decipher how the distribution of this research effort varied according to species taxonomy, phylogeny, distribution, ecology, life history and extinction risk. Using the number of references listed on the Web of Science for each species as a proxy for species research effort, we first show that this index is both robust to variation in search methods within WoS, and consistent with an index extracted from another online library (Scopus). The number of articles per species varied substantially, with 3441 articles for the green sea turtle alone, but only 475 total articles for all 50% least studied species taken together. This heterogeneity was consistent across time since the 1970s. Phylogenetic non-independence explained 66% of the variance in research effort (vs 58% for taxonomy). In addition, marine species, a group that only includes seven species, were particularly highly studied: five of the eight most studied Testudines are marine turtles. In contrast, freshwater and terrestrial species shared similar research effort values. Species occurring in Europe and North America were also more studied than species from, e.g., Central America or Africa, as were species that occur in the most scientifically active countries. In addition, species with a larger distribution range or introduced outside of their native range, as well as species with certain life history characteristics like larger clutches, smaller eggs or a longer longevity were more frequently investigated. In contrast, population trend and extinction risk did not predict research effort, although species that have not been assessed by the IUCN were characterized by a low research effort. This study underlines the importance of accounting for the heterogeneity in research effort across turtle species in global analyses and helps to identify taxa, regions, and life history strategies that should be the focus of more research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.