ReviewNeuro-degenerative diseases2026
The Utility of Speech and Language Analytics for Screening Alzheimer's Disease.
Review in Neuro-degenerative diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
<p>Background: Effective screening and cohort enrichment remain major challenges in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD), where traditional diagnostic pathways rely on costly, invasive, and time-consuming procedures. Speech and language analysis has emerged as a scalable, low-burden approach for detecting subtle cognitive-linguistic and motor-speech changes that may appear early in the disease course. Summary: This review synthesizes current evidence on acoustic, prosodic, lexical, semantic, and syntactic speech features associated with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and evaluates their reported utility across a range of elicitation tasks including picture description, verbal fluency, narrative recall, spontaneous speech, and reading. Across studies, machine-learning models trained on speech and language features have reported consistent performance, although results vary substantially depending on task design, feature sets, and cohort characteristics. Task-dependent variability is evident, with picture description and verbal fluency tasks capturing lexical-semantic and timing markers, while narrative and spontaneous speech tasks capture impairments in coherence, information content, and prosody. Hybrid approaches integrating hand-crafted and machine-extracted features have also been explored to improve interpretability and model performance. Speech and language analytics may support digital prescreening, cohort enrichment, and quality-assurance monitoring within clinical trials; however, their application depends on methodological considerations and validation across diverse settings. Key Messages: Despite encouraging findings, several methodological challenges persist, including interindividual variability, limited dataset sizes, differences in recording conditions, and limitations in automatic speech recognition performance in cognitively impaired populations. Continued development of standardized protocols, disorder-adapted speech models, and multimodal analytic pipelines is needed to support clinical translation. Collectively, current evidence suggests that speech and language features represent candidate digital markers that may improve screening efficiency and support clinical trial enrichment in AD, although further validation is required to establish their reliability and generalizability. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.