ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2026
A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polo-like Kinase 1 (PLK1) plays essential roles in the S, G2, and M phases of the cell cycle, and its overexpression is frequently observed in multiple cancers, including breast cancer, where it contributes to genomic instability and dysregulated apoptosis. Unlike conventional ATP-competitive inhibitors that target the kinase domain, selective inhibition of PLK1's polo-box domain (PBD) offers a promising strategy to disrupt protein-ligand interactions critical for mitotic progression, thereby triggering apoptosis in cancer cells. However, the high structural similarity between PLK1 and its homologs (PLK2 and PLK3), which are vital for neurological function and the stress response, respectively, necessitates exceptional selectivity to avoid off-target effects. To address this challenge, the protocol entails a bilingual (American Sign Language and English) computational workflow that integrates virtual screening, structural clustering, protein-ligand docking, binding affinity prediction, ADMET-S profiling, and quantum mechanical (QM) stability analysis. Starting from the SuperNatural 3.0 natural product database, compounds were filtered using breast cancer relevance and drug-likeness criteria, clustered to ensure chemical diversity, and evaluated their interactions with PLK1-, PLK2-, and PLK3-PBD structures. While virtual docking and in silico ADMET-S assessments cannot definitively confirm selectivity or mechanism of action, this study generates testable hypotheses and prioritizes a focused set of natural-product-derived candidates for future molecular dynamics simulations, biochemical validation, or experimental screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.