Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008355›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Alpha-band phase modulates perceptual sensitivity by changing internal noise and sensory tuning.

April Pilipenko, Alexandra McGowan, Jason Samaha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

April PilipenkoDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1084-229X
Alexandra McGowanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States.
Jason SamahaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8010-5993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpha-band neural oscillations (8-13 Hz) are theorized to phasically inhibit visual processing based, in part, on results showing that pre-stimulus alpha phase predicts detection (i.e., hit rates). However, recent failures to replicate and a lack of a mechanistic understanding regarding how alpha impacts detection have called this theory into question. We recorded EEG while six observers (6020 trials each) detected near-threshold Gabor targets embedded in noise. Using signal detection theory (SDT) and reverse correlation, we observed an effect of occipital and frontal pre-stimulus alpha phase on sensitivity (d'), not criterion. Hit and false alarm rates were counterphased, consistent with a reduction in internal noise during optimal alpha phases. Perceptual reports were also more consistent when two identical stimuli were presented during the optimal phase, suggesting a decrease in internal noise rather than signal amplification. Classification images revealed sharper spatial frequency and orientation tuning during the optimal alpha phase, implying that alpha phase shapes sensitivity by modulating sensory tuning towards relevant stimulus features.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmVisual PerceptionElectroencephalographyHumansPhotic Stimulationalpha rhythmEEGhumanneuroscienceoscillation phasereverse correlationsignal detection theoryvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID42008355
PMCPMC13095207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.