Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008193›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2026

Environmental microplastics: sources, environmental interactions, ecotoxicological effects and plastivore-mediated biodegradation.

Chandra Kant Singh, Nitin V, Kushneet Kaur Sodhi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chandra Kant Singh *Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, 110007, Delhi, India.
Nitin V *Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, 110007, Delhi, India.
Kushneet Kaur Sodhi *Department of Zoology, Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Khalsa College, University of Delhi, 110007, Delhi, India. kushneet@sgtbkhalsa.du.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs), as emerging pollutants, are potentially ingested by animals in aquatic and terrestrial environments, causing physical harm. The most widely produced synthetic polymers worldwide are polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyester (PET), polyethene (PE), polyamide (PA), and polypropylene (PP). To reduce microplastic density in the environment, studies evaluate the rate of MP ingestion by insect larvae. The larvae of insect orders Lepidoptera and Coleoptera are widely studied regarding MPs degradation. Additionally, the effect of MPs on insect physiology can be evaluated to further study their impact on human health. The review article focuses on the effect of MPs on growth, gut microbiota, and fertility of both aquatic and terrestrial insects. The paper also deals with widely researched ‘plastivore’ insects and the underlying mechanism of biodegradation and mineralisation of various forms of MPs by these insects. The structural resemblance of synthetic polymers to insect feed makes insects potential degraders of MPs. The change in abundance and type of gut microbiota in MPs-fed insect larvae compared to control larvae implies the significant role of gut microbiota and gut enzymes in MPs biodegradation.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsInsectaMicroplasticsAnimalsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEcotoxicologyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLarvaEnvironmental PollutantsMicroplasticsBacteriaDegradationinsectMicroplasticPlastivores

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.