ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Machine learning for land use change analysis in environmental protection areas.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic land use and land cover change (LULCC), combined with ongoing climate variability, poses significant challenges to environmental protection areas (EPAs) by altering ecosystem structure, degrading vegetation integrity, and disrupting local climate regulation. Despite their importance, traditional LULCC approaches often fail to incorporate dynamic environmental drivers, limiting their capacity to represent complex landscape-climate interactions. This study investigates the environmental dynamics of the Guaraqueçaba Environmental Protection Area and evaluates the landscape's potential for automated classification and prediction of impacts associated with land use change. A multitemporal dataset spanning 15 years (2009-2023) was analyzed, comprising an original set of approximately 30.2 million records of annual time series of precipitation, maximum and minimum temperatures, evapotranspiration, global solar radiation, relative humidity, wind speed, land use and land cover information, and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). To address class imbalance, a balanced subset of 3.6 million records was used for modeling. Predictive models were developed using multiple linear regression (MLR), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forest (RF), with performance assessed under both imbalanced and balanced data conditions using accuracy,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.