Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42008034›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026

Machine learning for land use change analysis in environmental protection areas.

Mayra Vannessa Lizcano Toledo, Johnnatan Rodrigues de Oliveira, Luis Armando De Oro Arenas, Leopoldo André Dutra Lusquinho Filho, Arthur Pereira Dos Santos, Raphael de Vicq Ferreira da Costa, Roberto Wagner Lourenço, Darllan Collins da Cunha E Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mayra Vannessa Lizcano ToledoSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Três de Março, Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18087-180, Brazil. mayra.lizcano@unesp.br.
Johnnatan Rodrigues de OliveiraSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Três de Março, Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18087-180, Brazil.
Luis Armando De Oro ArenasSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Três de Março, Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18087-180, Brazil.
Leopoldo André Dutra Lusquinho FilhoSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Três de Março, Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18087-180, Brazil.
Arthur Pereira Dos SantosSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Três de Março, Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18087-180, Brazil.
Raphael de Vicq Ferreira da CostaEarth Science Institute, Pole of the University of Minho, Campus Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal.
Roberto Wagner LourençoSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Três de Março, Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18087-180, Brazil.
Darllan Collins da Cunha E SilvaSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Três de Março, Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18087-180, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic land use and land cover change (LULCC), combined with ongoing climate variability, poses significant challenges to environmental protection areas (EPAs) by altering ecosystem structure, degrading vegetation integrity, and disrupting local climate regulation. Despite their importance, traditional LULCC approaches often fail to incorporate dynamic environmental drivers, limiting their capacity to represent complex landscape-climate interactions. This study investigates the environmental dynamics of the Guaraqueçaba Environmental Protection Area and evaluates the landscape's potential for automated classification and prediction of impacts associated with land use change. A multitemporal dataset spanning 15 years (2009-2023) was analyzed, comprising an original set of approximately 30.2 million records of annual time series of precipitation, maximum and minimum temperatures, evapotranspiration, global solar radiation, relative humidity, wind speed, land use and land cover information, and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). To address class imbalance, a balanced subset of 3.6 million records was used for modeling. Predictive models were developed using multiple linear regression (MLR), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forest (RF), with performance assessed under both imbalanced and balanced data conditions using accuracy,

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringMachine LearningClimate ChangeEcosystemPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestClimateLand use changeMachine learningModel evaluationVegetation

Identifiers

PMID42008034
PMCPMC13095965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.