SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Different doses of vitamin A supplementation as adjuvant treatment for pneumonia in children: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While previous meta-analyses have established a link between vitamin A supplementation and outcomes in children with pneumonia, the efficacy and safety of different dosing regimens remain unclear. Existing evidence is predominantly based on single-dose trials, creating a critical knowledge gap. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and VIP databases from their inception to December 2025. Study searches were independently carried out in December 2025 by two reviewers. Two researchers used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to independently assess the quality of the included studies. Data analysis was conducted through the "netmeta" package in R software (version 4.3.3). Twenty-five trials involving 3116 patients were included. Network meta-analysis revealed that medium-dose vitamin A supplementation was most effective in reducing the duration of fever and cough. Low-to-medium doses were consistently associated with better clinical outcomes than high-dose regimens. However, evidence regarding safety outcomes remained limited and inconclusive.
conclusionLow-to-medium dose vitamin A supplementation appears superior to high-dose regimens for alleviating clinical symptoms in children with pneumonia. However, the evidence is limited by high heterogeneity, indirect comparisons between dose groups, and poor reporting of adverse events. Future trials should prioritize direct dose-comparisons and rigorous safety monitoring to refine dosing guidelines. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Pneumonia poses a significant threat to the health and lives of children. Vitamin A supplementation plays an adjuvant role in the treatment of pneumonia in children. • There are currently divergent conclusions in the research regarding the optimal dosage of vitamin A, particularly with regard to the safety of high-dose supplementation and the effectiveness of low-dose supplementation. WHAT IS NEW: • This study revealed that medium-to-low-dose vitamin A supplementation appears to be more effective than high-dose therapy in alleviating the primary symptoms of childhood pneumonia. • This study also suggests that children in developed regions have higher baseline serum retinol levels, which may diminish the marginal benefits of high-dose supplementation and may even predispose them to its immunosuppressive effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42008030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.