ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Low awareness of proper use of cold and cough medication among Czech paediatricians: a questionnaire study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cough and cold medications (CCMs) are widely used in paediatric practice despite limited evidence of efficacy and concerns regarding safety in young children. This study aimed to evaluate Czech paediatricians' knowledge, attitudes, and recommendation practices related to CCMs and to identify factors associated with inappropriate use in children under 6 years of age. An anonymous questionnaire-based survey was distributed online to hospital paediatricians and general practitioners for children across the Czech Republic. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, patterns of CCMs use, knowledge of efficacy and safety, awareness of international recommendations, and attitudes toward potential restrictions and educational interventions. Associations were analysed using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Of 266 respondents, 74.1% reported using CCMs in children under 6 years and 40.6% in children under 2 years. Recommendation practices were not associated with age or postgraduate training but varied significantly by region and medical school attended. Reliance on international literature was associated with the lowest use of CCMs, whereas reliance on local sources or older colleagues predicted higher use. Lack of awareness of the unproven efficacy of CCMs, as well as recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics and Health Canada, were the strongest predictors of inappropriate recommendations. While knowledge of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency recommendation also showed association with a good recommendation practice, the association was not significant in the multivariable model.
conclusionDespite robust international guidance, CCMs remain commonly used in Czech paediatrics. Knowledge gaps, entrenched habits, and reliance on outdated information sources contribute to inappropriate use. Targeted educational initiatives and harmonised national guidelines are needed to improve practice. WHAT IS KNOWN: ● CCMs remain widely used in paediatrics despite limited efficacy and safety concerns in young children. ● International recommendations, including those from the AAP and Health Canada, advise against CCMs use in children under 6 years. WHAT IS NEW: ● In the Czech Republic, CCMs are used by 74% of paediatricians in children < 6 years and 41% in children < 2 years. ● CCMs recommendation practices vary by region and medical school, but not by age or training level. Higher inappropriate use is associated with reliance on local sources and older colleagues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.