Trial reportBlood advances2026
Clinical outcomes of lentiviral vector gene therapy for sickle cell disease.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02247843 (Clinical Research Study of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Research Study of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Using Peripheral Blood CD34+ Cells Modified With the Lenti/G-βAS3-FB Lentiviral Vector
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining durability in SCD gene therapy.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of lentiviral gene therapy for SCD.Blood advances · 2026Article
- The Journey of Gene Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease: How Molecular Advances Meet Clinical Care.Cells · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractSickle cell disease (SCD) is a monogenic disorder in which autologous gene therapy may offer a safer curative alternative to allogeneic transplantation. We report outcomes from a phase 1/2 study using the Lenti/G-βAS3-FB lentiviral vector, which encodes an antisickling β-globin. This single-site study treated 4 adults with severe SCD. The first patient was treated using the original Lenti/βAS3-FB and initial protocol, which resulted in suboptimal clinical response. Subsequent protocol refinements included improved hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) collection, using plerixafor-mobilized peripheral blood apheresis with precollection erythrocytapheresis, and the use of an optimized lentiviral vector with a transduction enhancer. All patients received myeloablative busulfan conditioning followed by infusion of gene-modified autologous HSPCs. Primary end points were safety and feasibility; secondary end points included gene marking, therapeutic hemoglobin expression, and clinical outcomes. All patients achieved hematopoietic recovery without rescue transplantation. The first patient demonstrated low gene marking (peak vector copy number [VCN], 0.035) and undetectable HbAS3 expression, with minimal clinical benefit. In contrast, the 3 patients treated with the optimized protocol achieved higher and sustained gene marking (peak granulocyte VCNs, ∼0.5-2.0) and persistent HbAS3 expression. These patients experienced some reductions in vaso-occlusive crises and transfusion requirements, with 2 becoming transfusion independent. No insertional oncogenesis was observed. This trial highlights the necessity of optimized vector design and transduction protocols to achieve durable gene expression. Although this specific vector will not be pursued further, the study provides crucial insights into gene therapy protocol development. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02247843.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.