ReviewACS applied materials & interfaces2026
Making Morphology Meaningful: Tracking Dynamic Catalyst Evolution under Working Conditions.
Review in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morphology control has long been a widely adopted strategy in catalyst design, based on the assumption that geometric and electronic structures are inseparable in determining catalytic behavior. This perspective revisits that assumption by highlighting how catalyst structures dynamically evolve under realistic reaction conditions. Traditional structural descriptors, including local structural metrics such as coordination number and morphology-related features such as facet exposure, are commonly derived from the as-synthesized state and may not reflect the actual active configurations during reactions. Evidence from photocatalytic, thermocatalytic, and electrocatalytic systems reveals that catalysts undergo significant structural and electronic transformations in response to illumination, thermal input, and applied potential. These findings challenge the conventional static structure-activity paradigm and call for a revised framework that integrates morphology control with in situ characterization techniques. By tracking structural, electronic, and compositional changes in real time, morphology can be redefined not as a fixed geometric label but as an evolving platform that connects initial design to dynamic catalytic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.