Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007915›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Machine-Learned Electrostatic Potentials for Accurate Hydration Free Energy Calculations.

Mathias Hilfiker, Leonardo Medrano Sandonas, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Ola Engkvist, Marco Klähn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathias HilfikerDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg CityL-1511, Luxembourg.ORCID 0009-0008-9401-3262
Leonardo Medrano SandonasInstitute for Materials Science and Max Bergmann Center for Biomaterials, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden01062, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7673-3142
Alexandre TkatchenkoDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg CityL-1511, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-1012-4854
Ola EngkvistMolecular AI, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg43183, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4970-6461
Marco KlähnMolecular AI, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg43183, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9369-4819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free energy calculations are widely used tools in computational chemistry, but their dependence on the assignment of partial charges during force field parametrization reduces their accuracy and reproducibility. In this work, we highlight the direct connection between the low accuracy of AM1-BCC charges on polar species and the poor accuracy of corresponding hydration free energy calculations. We then propose an XGBoost regressor trained on atomic descriptors to rapidly predict charges obtained with high-fidelity density functional theory calculations at PBE0-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP level. The more accurate electrostatic description results in more reliable free energy calculations than those obtained with semiempirical AM1-BCC charges. Finally, we leverage this predictive model in combination with a 1 ns gas-phase molecular dynamics simulation to propose the Boltzmann Percentile method for assigning charges representative of the conformational ensemble of a molecule. Charges obtained with this method are robust to different input conformations, and the resulting free energies, calculated on a subset of the FreeSolv data set, show a root mean squared error of 1.69 kcal/mol against the 3.05 kcal/mol obtained with semiempirical charges as well as a significantly better ranking. We provide a trained model, easily integrable into traditional workflows, enabling free energy calculations at the same computational cost as AM1-BCC charges. These two aspects make it a realistic tool for enhancing already expensive free energy calculations, and more in general, molecular dynamics simulations in condensed phase.

Identifiers

PMID42007915
PMCPMC13173528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.