ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2026
Unraveling Cross-Ring Dissociation Mechanisms of Hexoses in Collision-Induced Dissociation.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the fragmentation mechanisms of carbohydrates in mass spectrometry is essential for interpreting mass spectra and accurately identifying carbohydrate structures. In this study, we used β-glucose, methyl β-mannose, and four disaccharides─Manβ-(1→2)-Manβ, Manβ-(1→3)-Manβ, Manβ-(1→4)-Manβ, and GlcNAcβ-(1→2)-Manα─as model systems. Combining high-level quantum chemistry calculations with collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry experiments, we performed an extensive investigation of the cross-ring dissociation mechanisms of hexoses under collision-induced dissociation. In addition to the dissociation pathways proposed in previous studies, which account for the major cross-ring fragments, we identified new mechanisms that explain the minor cross-ring fragments. The newly proposed pathways begin with the same initial step as that of the previously reported mechanism: a ring-opening reaction initiated by hydrogen transfer from O1 to O5, followed by cleavage of the O5-C1 bond. The key distinction is that the established mechanism proceeds through a 1,2-hydrogen shift, whereas the newly identified pathways involve alternative hydrogen-shift processes. The low energy barrier associated with the 1,2-hydrogen shift explains the formation of major cross-ring fragments, while the higher energy barriers associated with the alternative hydrogen shifts account for minor fragments. Both the previously reported and newly proposed mechanisms occur only for hexose at the reducing end. The energy barriers for cross-ring dissociation of the hexose not at the reducing end are significantly higher, indicating that the hexose not at the reducing end contributes far less to cross-ring fragmentation. Applying these newly elucidated mechanisms to
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.