ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2026
Binaural sensitivity and processing of envelope-based interaural difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users with perilingual and postlingual onset of deafness.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cochlear implants deliver binaural cues primarily in the signal envelope through two unsynchronized sound processors, presenting challenges to bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users to (re)gain binaural hearing. Using a custom-designed acoustic complex to elicit multi-channel stimulation through the cochlear implant sound processors, this study measured sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) using a discrimination task while concurrently tracking eye gaze positions to reveal decision-making delays during binaural processing. Two groups of BiCI users were tested with either perilingual or postlingual onset of deafness. Results show all BiCI users exhibited ILD sensitivity and a majority (67% of the perilingual and 78% of the postlingual) demonstrated ITD sensitivity, though those with perilingual onset showed higher (poorer) ITD sensitivity compared to postlingual users. Additionally, ILD processing at suprathreshold magnitudes led to faster decision making as accuracy increased for both groups. However, ITD processing was less salient, with faster ITD processing observed only in the postlingual group. These findings provide insights into the differences in binaural processing in users based on the timing of deafness onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.