Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007658›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2026

Investigation of the Accuracy and Contributing Factors of AI-Based Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma in Canine Abdominal Radiography.

Masahiro Murakami, Kosuke Kinoshita, Mario Sola, Anthony Lutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masahiro MurakamiDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Kosuke KinoshitaDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Mario SolaDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Anthony LutzVetology Innovations, LLC, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a highly malignant urinary cancer of the transitional epithelium in dogs. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have shown substantial potential in veterinary medicine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI-based software in detecting UC in dogs using abdominal radiography and to identify factors that influence the sensitivity of AI-based diagnosis. Dogs underwent abdominal radiography, and ultrasound was retrospectively retrieved. Dogs with histologically confirmed UC and ultrasound changes were included in UC training and UC validation groups, whereas dogs without clinical suspicion of urinary neoplasia and without ultrasound findings consistent with UC were included as non-UC training and non-UC validation groups. Histological and imaging findings of UC were recorded. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained with 500 studies from the UC training and 500 studies from the non-UC training groups. For validation, an additional 185 studies from the UC validation and 180 studies from the non-UC validation groups were used to provide AI-based diagnosis of UC by the trained CNN. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the AI-based diagnosis of UC were 69%, 67%, and 68%, respectively. The software showed higher sensitivity in detecting more severe UC with mineralization. However, medial iliac lymphadenomegaly and ureteral obstruction did not improve the sensitivity of AI-based diagnosis. In conclusion, well-trained CNN demonstrated moderate accuracy for detecting UC using abdominal radiographs, with higher sensitivity in cases with more advanced disease. The unexpectedly superior performance of the ventrodorsal (VD) view warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinoma, Transitional CellDog DiseasesRadiography, AbdominalUrologic NeoplasmsAnimalsConvolutional Neural NetworksDogsFemaleMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyartificial intelligenceexplainable AItransitional cell carcinomax‐ray

Identifiers

PMID42007658
PMCPMC13094397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.