Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007645›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2026

Agreement and Accuracy of the Dural Tail Sign for Differentiating Canine Meningioma From Glioma on MRI.

John F Griffin, Alexander R Briggs, Samantha Glamann, Nick D Jeffery, Jonathan M Levine, Andra K Voges, Joseph M Mankin, Sharon C Kerwin, Clifford R Berry, Wilfried Mai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John F GriffinDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Alexander R BriggsDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Samantha GlamannDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Nick D JefferyDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-1788
Jonathan M LevineDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Andra K VogesDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Joseph M MankinDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Sharon C KerwinDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1981-0276
Clifford R BerryDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Wilfried MaiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, Section of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-6079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dural tail sign (DTS) is an imaging sign used to categorize intracranial masses based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) axial localization. It is common in masses arising from outside the neuroparenchyma (extra-axial) and rare in masses arising from the neuroparenchyma (intra-axial). Accuracy and agreement reports of the DTS in canine meningioma are variable. Therefore, our objectives were to report agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the DTS in dogs with a known diagnosis of meningioma or peripherally located glioma. This was a retrospective, secondary analysis, and cross-sectional study. Dogs with histologically confirmed meningioma or peripherally located glioma and 3T MRI were included. A total of 27 cases, 16 meningioma and 11 glioma, were included. Post-contrast T1-weighted images were provided to five blinded image evaluators in two separate randomized sessions separated by a 6-week washout period. Evaluators were asked to rate cases as "positive," "negative," or "indeterminate" for the DTS. All dogs with meningioma were rated positive for the DTS by a majority of evaluators in each session. The sensitivity and specificity for the DTS for the first session were 95% and 89.1%, respectively. Interobserver agreement for identifying the DTS was substantial (κ = 0.74), and intraobserver agreement across the two sessions was almost perfect (κ = 0.84). These findings indicate that, whereas not perfect, the DTS is accurate and reliable in the MRI differentiation of canine meningioma from glioma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDog DiseasesGliomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialDogsFemaleMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificitycentral nervous systemCNSmagnetic resonance imagingneoplasiatumor

Identifiers

PMID42007645
PMCPMC13094398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.