ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Harnessing Deep Learning in Searching Wild Relatives of Domestic Animals.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wild relatives of domestic animals are crucial reservoirs of genetic diversity, yet pervasive hybridization with domestic animals poses significant conservation challenges. Here, we developed a deep learning-based pipeline, consisting of a multi-layer perceptron for SNP panel selection and a Deep & Cross Network for model training, to discern wild relatives from their closely related domestic animals using genomic SNP data. Leveraging the 1960 genomes from 164 red jungle fowl (RJF; Gallus gallus) and 1796 domestic chicken samples, we applied this pipeline to yield the RJF identification model based on a 285-SNP panel. We employed this model to characterize domestic chickens, RJF, and hybrids in the independent genomic datasets from contemporary samples and historical specimens, respectively. The accuracy was 97.8% for historical samples with missing genotypes. The benchmarking multiple hybrid detection tools indicated that the RJF identification model was effective and practical. The further application to the genomic data from wild boar (Sus scrofa), domestic pigs, and their hybrids validated the pipeline. Our method has potential in not only monitoring genetic diversity in wild relatives of domestic animals but also supporting animal genetic resource conservation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.