ArticleJAMIA open2026
Provider survey to assess the usability and acceptability of an automated electronic health record-based tool for atrial fibrillation to improve anticoagulation management.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Implemented a tool to identify high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with a CHA Materials and Methods: An electronic survey was sent to 490 primary care and cardiology providers at Essentia Health (Duluth, MN, USA) to evaluate the usability, acceptability, and obtain feedback post-implementation. We excluded providers who did not complete the consent ( Results and Discussion: Survey response rate was 25% ( Conclusion: Survey respondents report above average usability and acceptability. Future evaluation of the AF Care Gap tool utilization and persistent gaps in anticoagulation management are still needed to improve management for high-risk AF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.