Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007434›Full record

ReviewNatural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2026

High impact low probability events: research landscape and future opportunities.

Lauren McMillan, Gianluca Pescaroli, Mhari Gordon, Margherita Maraschini, Silvia Torresan, José Palma-Oliveira, Beatriz Rosa, Ana Sarroeira, Benjamin D Trump, Igor Linkov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lauren McMillanDepartment for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, UK.
Gianluca PescaroliDepartment for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3468-2970
Mhari GordonDepartment for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, UK.
Margherita MaraschiniFondazione CMCC - Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Silvia TorresanFondazione CMCC - Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
José Palma-OliveiraFactor Social, Lisbon, Portugal.
Beatriz RosaFactor Social, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana SarroeiraFactor Social, Lisbon, Portugal.
Benjamin D TrumpUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Igor LinkovCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-impact, low-probability (HILP) events, characterised by their extreme consequences and inherent unpredictability, pose a growing challenge to disaster risk reduction in an era of systemic and cascading crises. Traditional risk assessment frameworks, which rely on probability-based models, often fail to capture the full scope of these events, leaving critical vulnerabilities unaddressed. This semi-systematic state-of-the-art review synthesizes current academic discourse on HILPs to identify their defining characteristics and implications for disaster preparedness and response. We analyse a dataset of 109 papers, highlighting the limitations of conventional planning tools and emphasising the need for adaptive, forward-looking strategies that integrate scenario planning, stress testing, and resilience assessment. The review finds that while HILPs are increasingly recognised in national risk registers and post-disaster response frameworks, their integration into preparedness, training, and governance systems remains limited. A key gap lies in translating theoretical insights into operational strategies that can be deployed before crises occur. The paper advocates for a hazard-agnostic, interdisciplinary approach that bridges risk and resilience thinking, enabling systems to anticipate, absorb, and adapt to a broad spectrum of threats. By advancing a research agenda beyond the Sendai Framework, this review contributes to a more robust understanding of HILPs and supports the development of more resilient and responsive disaster management systems.

Indexed as

Complex crisesHigh-impact low-probability (HILP) eventsResilience assessmentRisk governanceStress testingSystemic risk

Identifiers

PMID42007434
PMCPMC13086801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.