Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007416›Full record

ArticleStatistics and computing2026

Approximating evidence via bounded harmonic means.

Dana Naderi, Christian P Robert, Kaniav Kamary, Darren Wraith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana NaderiCEREMADE, Université Paris Dauphine-PSL, Paris, France.
Christian P RobertCEREMADE, Université Paris Dauphine-PSL, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6635-3261
Kaniav KamaryInstitut Camille Jordan, INSA Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Darren WraithSchool of Public Health & Social Work and Centre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8755-6471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient Bayesian model selection relies on the model evidence or marginal likelihood, whose computation often requires evaluating an intractable integral. The harmonic mean estimator (HME) has long been a standard method of approximating the evidence. While computationally simple, the version introduced by Newton and Raftery (1994) potentially suffers from infinite variance. To overcome this issue, Gelfand and Dey (1994) defined a standardized representation of the estimator based on an instrumental function and Robert and Wraith (2009) later proposed to use higher posterior density (HPD) indicators as instrumental functions. Following this approach, a practical method is proposed, based on an elliptical covering of the HPD region with non-overlapping ellipsoids. The resulting estimator, called the Elliptical Covering Marginal Likelihood Estimator (ECMLE), not only eliminates the infinite-variance issue of the original HME and allows exact volume computations, but is also able to be used in multimodal settings. Through several examples, we illustrate that ECMLE outperforms other recent methods such as THAMES and its improved version (Metodiev et al. 2025). Moreover, ECMLE demonstrates lower variance-a key challenge that subsequent HME variants have sought to address-and provides more stable evidence approximations, even in challenging settings. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-026-10875-z.

Indexed as

Harmonic mean estimatorHPD regionMarginal likelihoodModel evidenceNormalizing constantRosenbrock distribution

Identifiers

PMID42007416
PMCPMC13090188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.