Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007405›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Knowledge, practices, and barriers to early mobilization of critical care nurses in three hospitals in Sabah, Malaysia: A multicentre cross-sectional study.

Saniah Ajui, Boon Tat Yeap, Deena Clare Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saniah AjuiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
Boon Tat YeapDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
Deena Clare ThomasDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early mobilization (EM) is increasingly recognized as an important intervention in intensive care units (ICUs) to reduce complications associated with prolonged immobilization, including ICU-acquired weakness, delayed recovery, and longer hospital stay. Despite strong evidence supporting its benefits, EM implementation remains inconsistent in practice and may be influenced by variations in nurses' knowledge, clinical practices, and perceived barriers, particularly in resource-constrained settings. In Sabah, Malaysia, limited empirical evidence exists to systematically assess these factors across ICU settings. This paper presents a reproducible cross-sectional protocol to evaluate ICU nurses' knowledge, practices, and perceived barriers toward early mobilization across multiple centres in Sabah. The study uses proportionate stratified sampling and a structured self-administered questionnaire adapted from validated instruments, covering sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, practice, and perceived barriers. Knowledge will be assessed using a standardized scoring system based on Bloom's cut-off classification and reported as percentage scores categorized into low, moderate, and high levels. Practice patterns and perceived barriers will be summarized descriptively, including the most frequently reported barriers. This protocol offers a practical and scalable approach to assess EM implementation in ICU settings and may help identify gaps that inform targeted training, protocol refinement, and future implementation strategies.

Indexed as

ClinicalEarly mobilisationIntensive care unitNursing practiceQuestionnaireSurvey

Identifiers

PMID42007405
PMCPMC13090670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.