Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007403›Full record

ArticleBMJ neurology open2026

Longitudinal Orthostatic Tremor Study (LOTS): a multi-centre, prospective cohort protocol for characterising orthostatic tremor and orthostatic myoclonus.

Anish Mehta, Thyagarajan Shivashanmugam, Nitish Kamble, Aravind Prabhu, Michiko K Bruno, Louis Cs Tan, Pramod Pal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anish MehtaDepartment of Neurology, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, MS Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, Placeboes Research Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-1835
Thyagarajan ShivashanmugamDepartment of Clinical Research, Placeboes Research Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Nitish KambleDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Aravind PrabhuDepartment of Neurology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Michiko K BrunoMedical Director, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Louis Cs TanDepartment of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.
Pramod PalDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Orthostatic tremor (OT) is a rare movement disorder defined by high-frequency tremor predominantly in the standing position, often causing mobility limitation and reduced quality of life. Its natural history, disease burden and treatment response remain poorly understood due to limited longitudinal evidence. The Longitudinal Orthostatic Tremor Study (LOTS) aims to characterise clinical, demographic and therapeutic trajectories in OT and orthostatic myoclonus over 5 years. Methods and analysis: LOTS is a multicentre prospective cohort study expanding an initial retrospectively characterised cohort of 58 patients from a tertiary centre in India. Additional incident cases will be recruited across national and international sites over 2 years. Participants will undergo assessments at baseline, 6 months and annually for 5 years. Primary outcomes include the OT-10 scale and the novel OT Disease Burden Index. Secondary outcomes include electrophysiology (surface EMG), quality of life, OT Impact Profile and treatment response. Exploratory measures include neuroimaging, genetics, wearable-based metrics and gait analysis where feasible. Latent class analysis will identify subgroups with distinct trajectories, and mixed-effects models will assess longitudinal change and predictors of progression. Sensitivity analyses will account for differences between retrospective and prospective baselines. Anticipated limitations include attrition and variation in access to specialised electrophysiology. Trial registration number: This study has been registered with the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI; Registration number: CTRI/2025/10/096248).

Indexed as

QUALITY OF LIFETREMOR

Identifiers

PMID42007403
PMCPMC13084935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.