ArticlePhysical review. A2026
Separation estimation of two freely rotating dipole emitters near the quantum limit.
Article in Physical review. A, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
According to Rayleigh's criterion, two incoherent emitters with a separation below the diffraction limit are not resolvable with a conventional fluorescence microscope. One method of superresolution microscopy (SRM) circumvents the diffraction-limited resolution by precisely estimating the position of spatiotemporally independent emitters. However, these methods of SRM techniques are not optimal for estimating the separation of two simultaneously excited emitters. Recently, a number of detection methods based on modal imaging have been developed to achieve the quantum Cramér-Rao lower bound (QCRB) to estimate the separations between two nearby emitters. The QCRB determines the minimum achievable precision for all possible detection methods. Current modal imaging techniques assume a scalar field generated from a point source, such as a distant source from an optical fiber or a pinhole. However, for fluorescently labeled samples, point emitters are single fluorophores that are modeled as dipole emitters and, in practice, are often freely rotating. Dipole radiation must be described by vectorial theory, and the assumption of a scalar field no longer holds. Here, we present a method to numerically calculate the QCRB for measuring the separation of two dipole emitters, incorporating the vectorial theory. Furthermore, we propose a near-quantum optimal detection scheme based on one of the modal imaging techniques, superlocalization by image inversion interferometry (SLIVER), for estimating the separation of two freely rotating dipoles. In the proposed method, we introduce a vortex wave plate before the SLIVER detection to separate the radial and azimuthal components of the dipole radiation. With numerical simulations, we demonstrated that our method achieves nondivergent precision at any separation between two dipole emitters. We investigated several practical effects relevant to experimental measurements in superresolution microscopy, including numerical aperture, detection bandwidth, number of estimation parameters, background, and misalignment on separation estimation. Our proposed measurement provides a near-quantum-limited detection scheme for measuring the separation of two freely rotating dipole emitters, such as fluorescently tagged molecules, which are commonly used in superresolution microscopy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.