Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007367›Full record

ReviewTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026

Assessment of proton versus photon therapy in the reduction of lymphopaenia in thoracic cancers: A scoping review.

Erin Meagher, Michelle Leech

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin MeagherApplied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Michelle LeechApplied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymphopaenia is characterised by a substantial decrease in lymphocytes, and is experienced by patients receiving radiation therapy for lung and oesophageal cancers. Tumour control and overall survival may be negatively impacted by lymphopaenia. Because of dosimetric benefits which reduce healthy tissue exposure, proton therapy may potentially reduce the prevalence of lymphopaenia, compared to photon therapy.The purpose of this scoping review was to evaluate the difference in lymphopenia experienced by patients treated with photon or proton therapy for lung and oesophageal cancers. It assessed the incidence and severity of radiation-induced lymphopenia for each treatment modality and dose to lymphoid organs. Methodology: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted. The review included both patients who developed lymphopaenia and those who did not, allowing for comparative analysis. Results: Proton therapy was associated with reduces rates of severe lymphopaenia (Grade ≥ 3), compared with photon therapy. Evidence linking reduced lymphopaenia and overall survival varied, with some studies indicating benefits, while others found no difference. Conclusion: Proton therapy demonstrated an advantage in minimising lymphopaenia compared to photon therapy. There is a need to establish dose volume constraints for lymphoid organs and determine the impact of lymphopaenia on survival.

Indexed as

LymhopaeniaProton beam therapyThoracic malignancies

Identifiers

PMID42007367
PMCPMC13089123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.