Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007354›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Development and internal validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting dialysis risk in patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease.

Peng Shu, Dan Qin, Fang Xu, Li Guo, Zhuping Wen, Xia Wang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peng Shu *The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dan Qin *The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Fang Xu *The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Li GuoThe Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhuping WenThe Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xia WangThe Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinicians need practical tools to identify chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients at highest short-term risk of dialysis using only routine clinical data. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 400 adults with CKD stages 3-4 treated at The Central Hospital of Wuhan (2022-2024). Incident hemodialysis during follow-up was the outcome. From 64 candidate variables, LASSO logistic regression embedded within 10-fold cross-validation selected predictors spanning renal, hematologic, and metabolic domains. Ten machine learning models were trained and evaluated using nested cross-validation; temporal validation was performed on a 2024 hold-out set. Performance was summarized as mean ± SD with 95% confidence intervals. Results: After correcting for data leakage, the Random Forest model demonstrated excellent discrimination with an AUC of 0.988 (95% CI: 0.974-1.003), accuracy of 0.965 (95% CI: 0.941-0.989), and recall of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.926-1.015). XGBoost and ANN showed comparable AUCs (0.987 and 0.985, respectively). Temporal validation yielded perfect discrimination (AUC = 1.000, recall = 1.000). Subgroup analysis showed consistent performance across sex, age, and diabetes strata. SHAP analysis identified creatinine, urine microalbumin, and eGFR as key predictors, with evidence of interaction between proteinuria and erythropoietic dysfunction. Conclusion: A model based on widely available clinical tests accurately predicts 12-month dialysis risk in stage 3-4 CKD patients. Its high performance and interpretability support potential use for early risk stratification in real-world nephrology practice, without requiring novel biomarkers or longitudinal monitoring.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsChinaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorschronic kidney diseasehemodialysis predictionLASSO regressionmachine learningSHAP interpretability

Identifiers

PMID42007354
PMCPMC13083080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.