Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007301›Full record

ArticleMacromolecules2026

Segmental Interaction Energy Controls a Wide Range of Material Behavior.

Ronald P White, Jane E G Lipson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Macromolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ronald P WhiteDepartment of Chemistry, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-1736
Jane E G LipsonDepartment of Chemistry, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-9373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In molecular and material modeling, the interaction energy (ε) between segments is a key parameter. Its value is typically specified by connecting experimental thermodynamic behavior, e.g., pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) data, with a model relationship, e.g., a theoretical equation of state (EOS). In this paper, we elevate the practical importance of segmental interaction energies by demonstrating their influence over a surprisingly wide span of behavior, from molecular relaxation and glassification to polymer miscibility. We also quantify an exceptionally strong, direct correlation between ε and the thermal expansion coefficient, which opens opportunities when system data are limited, broadening the scope of thermodynamic characterization to methods such as ellipsometry. Using a variety of experimental data to obtain ε, alongside the EOS prediction for molecular size, we draw bright lines from thermodynamic characterization to predictions for the glass transition temperature, relaxation times associated with the (segmental/structural) α-process, and both activation energies and relaxation times for the small-scale collective motions that enable the newly revealed Slow Arrhenius Process (SAP). The latter is connected to phenomena ranging from stress relaxation and flow to adsorption and crystallization, lipid transfer, and physical aging. We then reverse the path from characterization to prediction by showing that dynamic measurements, specifically on SAP relaxations, can be used to characterize segmental interactions. We demonstrate that the resulting dynamics-derived parameters are effective in making verifiable predictions about polymer miscibility.

Identifiers

PMID42007301
PMCPMC13085815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.