Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007260›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Second-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction After Three Failures With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction, Medial Meniscal Root Repair With Centralization Suture, and Inside-Out Lateral Meniscal Repair.

Nicholas K Retzer, Rylan A Behnke, Benjiman J Wilebski, Luke V Tollefson, Matthew T Rasmussen, Dustin R Lee, Robert F LaPrade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas K RetzerTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8944-3421
Rylan A BehnkeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4466-9817
Benjiman J WilebskiTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8903-544X
Luke V TollefsonTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew T RasmussenTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Dustin R LeeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Robert F LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-2306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is a relatively common occurrence and is even more likely in the presence of medial meniscal deficiency. ACL tears cause significant knee instability, particularly anterolaterally, and are commonly treated with a surgical reconstruction. Indications: During a revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR), clinical studies have demonstrated that correcting medial meniscus pathologies and reconstructing the anterolateral ligament (ALL) improve outcomes. This is the patient's fourth ACLR, complicated by a concomitant extruded medial meniscal root tear, and confirmed on clinical examination and imaging. An ALL reconstruction (ALLR) and medial meniscal root repair with a centralization suture were therefore indicated during the revision ACLR. Technique Description: The technique described was used for a revision ACLR after 3 failed reconstructions with a concomitant ALLR and lateral meniscal peripheral and medial meniscal root repair as part of the second stage of a 2-stage surgery. The first stage of surgery included ACL tunnel debridement and bone grafting. The second stage procedure described here included a revision ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and an ALLR using the inferior portion of the iliotibial band, fixated with suture anchors to recreate the anatomic proximal and distal attachment sites. For the menisci, a lateral meniscal posterolateral peripheral tear was repaired using an inside-out technique, and the medial meniscal root tear was repaired with a double transtibial tunnel root repair with a centralization suture to reduce extrusion. Results: Recent literature has demonstrated that rerevision ACLR improved functional outcomes and overall knee stability. Despite these improvements, the overall rate of return to preinjury activity levels was poor, with high inter-study variability. Discussion: A complex revision ACLR with an ALLR and multiple meniscal repairs is described, along with technical considerations to improve long-term outcomes and minimize complication risks. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

anterolateral ligament reconstructioncentralization sutureinside-out lateral meniscal repairmedial meniscus root repairre-rerevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42007260
PMCPMC13087362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.