Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007256›Full record

ReviewRegenerative therapy2026

Biofabrication strategies for engineered constructs in cardiovascular tissue repair.

Junjie Yu, Daiki Murata, Manabu Itoh, Koichi Nakayama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junjie YuCenter for Regenerative Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Daiki MurataCenter for Regenerative Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Manabu ItohDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Koichi NakayamaCenter for Regenerative Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating a paradigm shift in treatment approaches. Biofabrication, which involves the creation of patient-specific structures for tissue repair, has emerged as a promising approach. Recent advances in tissue engineering and additive manufacturing have accelerated progress in this field, making a comprehensive overview timely. This review examines various biofabrication technologies used in cardiovascular research, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages, and details the advances in biofabricated cardiac patches, valves, vessels, and stents based on papers published over the past decade. By synthesizing findings across studies, we identify emerging trends, current challenges, and potential future directions. This review aims to guide researchers in exploring biofabrication-based strategies for cardiovascular tissue repair.

Indexed as

BiofabricationCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular tissue repairRegenerative medicineTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID42007256
PMCPMC13089058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.