Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007245›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery practice2026

Protocol for Development of an Evidence-Based Rapid Readiness Screen.

Simon Oczkowski, Thomas Bayuk, John Basmaji, Bradley A Dengler, Michael McCrea, Sameer Sharif, Katie Stout, Gregory W J Hawryluk, Halinder S Mangat, Jamshid Ghajar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simon OczkowskiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-8948
Thomas BayukDepartment of Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
John BasmajiGuidelines in Intensive Care, Development, and Evaluation (GUIDE) Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Bradley A DenglerDepartments of Surgery and Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Michael McCreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Sameer SharifDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Katie StoutTraumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Gregory W J HawrylukCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Halinder S MangatBrain Trauma Foundation, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jamshid GhajarBrain Trauma Foundation, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In combat and sport, there is an urgent need to identify readiness for performance to decide on removal from and return to activity. Cognitive readiness, including attention, can be impaired for many potentially coexisting reasons, including concussive or subconcussive injury, insufficient sleep/fatigue, and intoxication. Standard tests of concussion, sleep deprivation, and intoxication are often lengthy or require specialized skill or equipment to conduct. The ideal readiness screen should predict readiness or be associated with surrogate measures of readiness, be sensitive to multiple conditions that may impair readiness, and be reliable and rapid. This study outlines the methodology for an evidence-based process to develop multimodal rapid screening tests for readiness that are applicable across a broad range of environments, including military far-forward/sports sideline, garrison, and clinic.

Indexed as

AssessmentAttentionConcussionIntoxicationMilitaryScreenScreeningSleepSport

Identifiers

PMID42007245
PMCPMC13086413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.