ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Implantation of Enhanced Versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses With a Myopic Target Refraction: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of enhanced monofocal IOL (Eyhance) and monofocal IOL (TECNIS) implantation in cataract patients whose target refraction is myopia. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review for patients who underwent cataract surgery and whose target refraction is myopia (-3 D). A total of 68 eyes were enrolled (34 patients enrolled: enhanced monofocal (Group 1) = 32 eyes, monofocal (Group 2) = 36 eyes; bilateral IOL implantation in each patient). For the primary endpoint, uncorrected and corrected near (UNVA and CNVA), intermediate (UIVA and CIVA), and distant (UDVA and CDVA) visual acuities; manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE); and satisfaction score were evaluated before and 3 months after surgery. Results: Postoperative CIVA was significantly better in Group 1 (0.09 ± 0.05 logMAR) compared to Group 2 (0.21 ± 0.22 logMAR; mean difference: 0.12 logMAR; Conclusion: Enhanced monofocal IOL with a myopic target showed better corrected intermediate vision and uncorrected very near vision at 20 cm compared with monofocal IOL. Overall satisfaction with enhanced monofocal IOL is also higher than with monofocal IOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.