Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007239›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026

The Use of Deep Learning in Distinguishing Chalazion and Eyelid Mass.

Anfei Li, Gabriella Schmuter, Shehroz Rana, Sayyada Hyder, Pratik Patel, Amy Hembree, Amylisa Philips, Simone Prather, Mark Curato, Kira Segal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anfei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5124-7068
Gabriella SchmuterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Shehroz RanaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Sayyada HyderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Pratik PatelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Amy HembreeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Amylisa PhilipsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Simone PratherDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Mark CuratoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-6387
Kira SegalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Kyle J GodfreyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.
Gary LelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA, cornell.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9486-6022

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Our study investigated the ability of artificial intelligence to differentiate eyelid lesions to support its potential use as a tool to better inform referrals to oculoplastic surgery specialists by other healthcare providers. Specifically, our study tested artificial intelligence's ability to distinguish benign chalazia from alternative eyelid masses that may require advanced subspecialized care with oculoplastic specialists. Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 206 photographs of diagnosed chalazia from 183 patients and 517 photographs from 486 patients with non-chalazia eyelid lesions to train and test a convolutional neural network (CNN). Network architectures including VGG-16, VGG-19, ResNet50, Xception, and MobileNetV2 were trained. Their performances were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) as the main outcome metric. Additionally, performances of CNN models were compared to those of frontline physicians. Results: VGG-16 and VGG-19 architectures achieved meaningful performance when trained with photographs of chalazion and eyelid mass achieving AUCs of 0.797 and 0.703, respectively. Adjusting detection thresholding allowed the VGG-16 and VGG-19 models to achieve sensitivity of 93% and 98% in predicting eyelid mass, respectively. This was an improvement over classification by frontline physicians who achieved an accuracy of 61% and a sensitivity of 65% for mass detection. Conclusions: We showed that using a CNN trained with clinical external photographs could successfully distinguish a chalazion from an alternative eyelid mass, supporting its potential use as a tool for healthcare providers to assist in determining whether a mass requires oculoplastic referral for subspecialty care.

Indexed as

AIchalazioneyelid mass

Identifiers

PMID42007239
PMCPMC13089635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.