ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Center2026
A global review and perspective on prostate cancer survival: findings from survival studies of cancer registration data.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To better understand global status, temporal trends, and geographic disparities of prostate cancer survival, we systematically collected published survival studies on prostate cancer from cancer registries worldwide. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI and SEER for survival studies from cancer registries up to April 30, 2025. We synthesized data on observed, relative and net survival since the 1990s, along with age-standardized survival, and further stratified based on age at diagnosis and stage. Results: The overall survival was favorable and exhibited a continuous improving trend. In most countries and regions, the 5-year relative survival rate exceeded 70%. However, substantial geographic disparities were observed. The prognosis was better in developed countries in Europe and America than that in less developed countries in Asia and Africa. Since 2000, the age-standardized 5-year relative survival was the highest in the United States at 98.5% (2007-2010), while it was the lowest in Punjab of India at 30.3% (2013-2016). The prognosis was poorest for patients aged ≥ 75, or for those diagnosed with distant or stage IV. Conclusions: Although the survival has been improving over the past three decades, disparities between developed and less developed countries still persist. The extent of the popularization of prostate screening programs, the age or stage at diagnosis, and the sophistication of healthcare systems are likely to be significant contributing factors to these differences. Our results can provide fundamental statistics for formulating and refining relevant policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.