ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Center2026
Catching pancreatic cancer early: Are we there yet?
Review in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunomagnetic-MXene Bifunctional Probes for Ultrasensitive and Specific Terahertz Metasensing of Tumor-Derived Exosomes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Pan-cancer profiles of mesothelin (MSLN) unveil diagnostic potential and therapeutic targetability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide, primarily due to its aggressive nature and the predominance of late-stage diagnoses. The 5-year survival rate remains dismal, often below 7 %, underscoring the urgent need for effective early detection strategies. Despite advancements in imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), population-wide screening remains impractical due to the disease's low incidence and lack of specific early biomarkers. Recent technological innovations, including artificial intelligence (AI)-driven imaging analysis and the discovery of circulating biomarkers have shown promising potential in improving early diagnosis and risk stratification. AI-enabled pancreas segmentation and radiomics further enhance the detection of subtle morphological changes that may be imperceptible to human naked eyes. However, these approaches remain largely investigational and require further validation, standardization, and clinical integration. This review summarizes current advances and ongoing challenges in early PDAC detection, emphasizing that despite promising developments, clinically effective early detection strategies are still lacking. Continued efforts to integrate multi-omics profiling, refine imaging technologies, and incorporate AI-assisted diagnostics into validated, risk-based screening models are essential to move toward earlier intervention and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.